Dota 2Esports

OG beat Team Liquid 3–1 to win The International 2019

OG beat Team Liquid 3–1 in The International 2019 final, recovering from game one to become Dota 2’s first repeat and back-to-back TI champion. Read our.

OG and Team Liquid playing The International 2019 grand final in Shanghai
OG recovered from the opening game to defeat Team Liquid 3–1 at TI9.

OG defeated Team Liquid 3–1 on August 25, 2019 in Shanghai to win The International 2019. The same five players who lifted the Aegis in 2018 became the first roster to win consecutive Internationals and the first organization to claim the title twice.

Road to the final

OG led Group B with a 14–2 game record, then beat Newbee, Evil Geniuses and PSG.LGD through the upper bracket. Liquid began in the lower bracket and survived six elimination series, defeating Fnatic, TNC, Royal Never Give Up, Evil Geniuses, Team Secret and PSG.LGD to reach the final.

OG vs Team Liquid TI9 final: series recap

Liquid won the opening game through durable team fighting, but OG changed the pace immediately. Io carry, Tiny pressure and fast objective conversion forced Liquid to respond across the map. OG won the next three games, often turning small skirmishes into towers and control before Liquid’s combinations could settle.

The decisive pattern

OG’s drafts looked unusual but served a consistent purpose: sustain aggression without long recovery periods. JerAx and Ceb kept fights connected while Topson invaded dangerous spaces that pulled attention from ana. Liquid could win an exchange and still lose the next objective because OG returned to pressure so quickly.

Why the result still matters

The repeat title transformed OG’s 2018 underdog run into a dynasty. It also broadened professional discussion about draft flexibility and psychological pressure: comfort picks were powerful not because they were secret, but because opponents still had to solve several credible strategies at once.

Scores, dates and placements were checked against published tournament records. Tactical conclusions describe the recorded games and are not presented as quotations from players or coaches.

Sources: official information or tournament records. Factual claims were checked against the linked record; interpretation is our own.

Continue with the Kaizensclan archive and our practical gaming guides.

Editorial note

Facts and mechanics were checked against the linked primary sources before publication.

This article was reviewed on August 10, 2026.

Portrait of Dmitri Aslanov
Written by

Reviews editor

Dmitri reviews games by tracing their complete loop: how a system is introduced, how it changes under pressure and whether it still produces interesting decisions after the novelty fades. He has a particular interest in RPG economies, tactical combat and performance problems that alter mechanical feel. Every verdict is written for a specific player rather than an imaginary universal audience.

View profile and articles →

Community channel

Join the discussion

0 comments
No comments yet.

Start a thoughtful, specific conversation about this story.