League of LegendsEsports

Samsung Galaxy sweep SKT to win Worlds 2017

Samsung Galaxy swept SK Telecom T1 3–0 in the 2017 World Championship final, ending SKT’s bid for a third consecutive title. Read the verified details, context.

Samsung Galaxy lifting the League of Legends Worlds 2017 trophy
Samsung Galaxy ended SKT’s title defence with a 3–0 final in Beijing.

Samsung Galaxy defeated SK Telecom T1 3–0 in the 2017 World Championship final at Beijing National Stadium on November 4. The result ended SKT’s attempt to win a third consecutive world title.

Road to the final

Samsung finished second in its group, then swept Longzhu Gaming and defeated Team WE 3–1. SKT survived two five-game series against Misfits and Royal Never Give Up, with Faker repeatedly carrying difficult positions. The final was also a rematch of Worlds 2016, when SKT beat Samsung 3–2 in Los Angeles.

Samsung Galaxy vs SKT Worlds 2017: how the series unfolded

Samsung controlled game one through scaling and objective play, then won a far tighter second game after resisting SKT’s attempts to accelerate. Game three produced the defining finish. With SKT trying to hold the map, Ruler’s Varus flashed forward to catch Faker’s Karma with Chain of Corruption, opening the engagement that completed the sweep.

The decisive detail

Samsung removed the chaos that had allowed SKT to escape earlier series. Crown absorbed the mid-lane assignment, Ambition connected lanes through measured jungle routes and CoreJJ supplied engage or protection when required. Ruler did not need to force every fight; the decisive flash worked because vision, positioning and follow-up were already prepared.

Why the result still matters

The final marked Samsung’s second world championship lineage after the organisation’s 2014 victory and gave Ambition a title after his transition from mid lane to jungle. It remains one of the clearest examples of a team defeating a dynasty by narrowing the game instead of trying to match every improvisation.

Map or game scores, event dates and placements were checked against tournament records. Tactical conclusions are analysis and are not presented as quotations from players or coaches.

Sources: official information and published records. Factual claims were checked against the linked source and additional primary records; interpretation is our own.

Explore more reporting in the Kaizensclan archive and continue with our practical gaming guides.

Editorial note

Facts and mechanics were checked against the linked primary sources before publication.

This article was reviewed on August 10, 2026.

Portrait of Dmitri Aslanov
Written by

Reviews editor

Dmitri reviews games by tracing their complete loop: how a system is introduced, how it changes under pressure and whether it still produces interesting decisions after the novelty fades. He has a particular interest in RPG economies, tactical combat and performance problems that alter mechanical feel. Every verdict is written for a specific player rather than an imaginary universal audience.

View profile and articles →

Community channel

Join the discussion

0 comments
No comments yet.

Start a thoughtful, specific conversation about this story.